The Minimum Lovable Product: Why Minimum Viable Isn't Enough
MVP thinking was supposed to help founders ship faster. Instead it became an excuse to ship bad products. Here's the reframe that actually works.
Glauber Bannwart
March 15, 2026 · 2 min read
The Minimum Lovable Product: Why Minimum Viable Isn't Enough
The MVP concept was supposed to free founders from perfectionism. Ship something imperfect, learn from real users, iterate.
In practice, it produced a generation of "minimum" products that were too bad to reveal real signal — products where users churned not because the idea was wrong, but because the execution was too rough to evaluate.
The Problem With "Viable"
"Viable" is a floor. It means the product technically works. It doesn't mean it's pleasant to use, or that it makes the user feel good about their decision to try it, or that it creates the kind of first impression that leads to word-of-mouth.
A viable product can validate that users complete a flow. It can't validate that users will come back, tell friends, or pay money to keep using it.
The Minimum Lovable Product
The MLP asks: "What is the smallest, most focused version of this product that a specific user would genuinely love?"
Lovable means:
- It solves the problem completely (not halfway)
- The core experience is polished, even if scope is narrow
- Using it creates a positive emotional response
- It would be clearly missed if it disappeared
The MLP is usually narrower in scope than the MVP but higher in quality on the things it does. Ten features that work adequately vs. two features that work beautifully.
How to Build an MLP
Step 1: Define the one job Your MLP does one thing extremely well. Not three things adequately. What is the single most important job your product does for your best user?
Step 2: Remove everything else Everything that isn't the single job gets cut. Ruthlessly. You can build it back after you've proven the core.
Step 3: Make the core experience excellent Invest in the quality of the core flow. Fast load times. Clear empty states. Helpful error messages. Thoughtful onboarding. These things feel like polish but they're actually what determines whether the product is "lovable."
Step 4: Test it with people who want to love it Your first users should be the people most likely to be your best customers — not just anyone who's willing to try it.
The MLP Test
Show someone your product without explaining it. Watch them use it without coaching. After five minutes, ask: "How do you feel about it?"
If the answer is anything other than positive surprise or genuine enthusiasm, you have an MLP problem — either the scope is wrong or the quality isn't there yet.
FounderSequence helps founders find the right scope for their initial product. Submit your lean canvas →
React to this article